Evan Williams on Twitter's #fixreplies controversy

I had an interesting chat just now with Twitter's CEO Evan Williams (@ev) about the company's #fixreplies, #twitterfail problems this week (in which a status change that apparently impacted just 2% of Twitter users ignited a firestorm.)

I asked him what had driven their decision to change how replies worked. Engineering issues or (as originally stated) a desire to reduce user confusion?

Answer:  Both. 

(And now I'm paraphrasing him, not quoting): The engineering issue was significant in that even though the vast majority of users were on the default option (of seeing only those replies that go to others you follow) the system still had to investigate the relevant status of all of a user's followers every time he/she submitted a reply.  But equally important was the fact that the choices were simply confusing.  Twitter's ethos has always been that if you keep the rules simple and clear, users will do amazing things.  They were noticing that many, perhaps most, Twitter users weren't 100% clear on who would see their replies. (I was among them.) The concept of 'mutual friend/follower' is not obvious and having the extra two choices (that v few were using) made it that much more confusing. Different users would treat replies in different ways, expanding the confusion.  It's not always the case that more individual choice is a good thing for the overall system. Simplicity and clarity are really important for a well-functioning community.

And then the endearing bit: "Look we know we screwed up the way this was handled." But they'd learned a lot from the episode and were determined it be turned to the good, by using the torrent of feedback to build a stronger solution than before.  From what he hinted at, they're well on the way.

The temporary fix is here.  But they'll have something better soon.  (And he also said they would fix a confusing bug in the old Twitter search engine: currently, when you click to reply to a listed name, their @name does not appear in the text-box as it should.) 

If I had to guess, I'd say they'll come out of this OK. They're smart guys, with an obsessive commitment to the explosively-growing Twitter community. Exhibit A: this talk Evan gave at TED this year.

It's not been their best week, but in the immortal words of Friedrich Nietsche "That which does not kill you, makes you stronger."
4 responses
I like the following: "Twitter's ethos has always been that if you keep the rules simple and clear, users will do amazing things." and "Simplicity and clarity are really important for a well-functioning community." Thanks, Chris
There is something really weird in the explanation!
Please bear with me: There are 3 options. Always, Sometimes, Never. The default is Sometimes and over 95% use it. In order to change to one of the other options (always or never), one had to be pro-active. If you change them, its because you wanted them. It does not matter why, you just wanted and hence you selected the option. That would make you happy.
The Sometimes option, while defaulted was also the most confusing and needed to be addressed to clear the line of what each @replies one sees.

What has Twitter decided: Everybody into the Sometimes option that is too confusing and needs to be worked.

I'm I the only one that thinks this is strange?

I'm not saying that always or never wouldn't be confusing as well (too much noise, not enough noise), but at least they wouldn't be as confusing as the Sometimes option.

It was a very bad move from twitter. The kind of move I would never guess they would take after this long time in the job. Even more: they had the exact same feedback one year ago when they implemented the default option. It was time to think that they would have learned a bit more about how twitter works!
My guess is that they are starting to give too much importance on how THEY use the service and not in how the service can be/was/is used.

PS: I still think the 2% number strange after seeing all that firestorm. I would like to see the number related to active accounts.

Evan's co-founder Biz Stone added a helpful blog-post last night. http://tr.im/lrGN
Internet is back in Iran,ppl get access to twitter & FB, there's no suspicious in this. Most ppl know abt proxy anyway